[Info-vax] The Gender Fluid IT Crisis

[Dirk Munk]

Richard Maher wrote:
> On 31-Jul-17 3:42 AM, Dirk Munk wrote:
>> David Froble wrote:
>>> Dirk Munk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, and he still allowed to express his opinion. That doesn't mean 
>>>> an organization doesn't have the right
>>>
>>> Just because one has the "right" to do something doesn't make it 
>>> "the right thing to do".
>>
>> True, but that also applies to Mr. Eich. He had the constitutional 
>> right to take the position that he took. But many people will have 
>> seen that as trampling around on the very basic right of happiness 
>> and dignity of a minority, and they didn't want a person like that 
>> having an important position in the Mozilla organization.
>>
>
> "Take a position"??? He donated money as a private citizen in his 
> private capacity and was outed by the Gestapo! You should go further 
> and burn down his house. Yet we have the head of Qantas over here 
> using shareholder funds to pursue his very public agenda of "Ugly gay 
> boys like me should get married too!" and no one says anything.

Perhaps his shareholders think that this agenda makes Quantas look like 
an open minded company, and that is good for business.

> Someone shoves a pie in his face and he gets taken out and shot with 
> hard labour.

Yes, that is what you can expect when you use violence. Perhaps the 
judge also took in account the reason for shoving the pie, and that 
didn't give him any reason to be lenient.

>
> Who else will you target? Those fucking Christians keep sticking their 
> heads up about morality and the sanctity of marriage,

Morality? Others may find it immoral if you try to force your idea of 
morality and sanctity on others. They find it immoral to deny homosexual 
people the same rights heterosexual people have.

> time to give them a good kicking eh?

No, we have ultra-orthodox Christians here, and they have their own 
political party in parliament. The leader of that party is highly 
respected, and often asked for his opinions on TV.

> The whole idea of "sanctity" must be anathema to any free thinking 
> person and banned as a concept. Why not make them wear little yellow 
> crosses so that people can identify them and spit on them in the 
> streets? It worked for you guys before.

I get the impression that your kind of people would like to see gays in 
striped pyjamas with a pink triangle.


> The National government funded broadcaster here (ABC) is at war with 
> Christianity and attacking it every night on TV. 

There are many so called 'Christians' who know every verse in the bible, 
and use their 'faith' as a weapon to tell others how to live and how not 
to live. These pseudo Christians think they are God by proxy.

> Let's go global? (Muslims throwing homosexuals off tall buildings 
> doesn't seem news worthy)

You don't like that?

>
> Time for you to bring up the Spanish inquisition isn't it? At least 
> when Spain and Germany Lorded over you we didn't have to put up with 
> your shit.
>
> Your "minority" is much more important than theirs!

Who is 'theirs' please?

>   No poverty in Holland?

Yes

> No people sleeping rough on the streets? 

Yes, many of them even like it. And they can get about €500 per month 
social security.

> Domestic violence

Yes, of course like in any country.

> and drug abuse non-issues? 

Not that much. Far less than in other countries.

> How's the economy going?

Excellent, thank you for asking.

> As long as you've got your priorities right, that's the main thing :-(

Yes, civil liberties and respect for minorities are high on the agenda.

>
> Oh, I get it. Your helpless "minority" is actually the most 
> well-funded and resourced lobby group in the world.

Ah, that well known argument again. In the 1930's Hitler used it as 
well, it was called "Das internationale Finanzjudentum", but I guess you 
can use it for gays as well.

> Between politicians that can be bought (99%) and those with a hidden 
> rent-boy in the cupboard this'll be easy.

Politicians don't need a hidden rent-boy in the cupboard over here. If 
they are gay, that's fine with us. There are numerous gay politicians. 
We had/have gay ministers and MPs, Belgium and Luxembourg had a gay 
prime minister, Germany a gay foreign minister, Iceland has or had a 
lesbian prime minister, and so on.

So no need to buy politicians.