[Info-vax] Fortran
Arne Vajhøj
arne at vajhoej.dk
Mon Dec 3 16:20:15 EST 2018
On 12/3/2018 3:56 PM, Dave Froble wrote:
> On 12/3/2018 3:21 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 12/3/2018 8:12 AM, Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote:
>>> Was "earlier VMS architectures" even mentioned in the post from Phillip?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> But I think there are two different sort of implicit assumptions:
>>
>> will XYZ be available on VMS = will XYZ be available on VMS x86-64
>>
>> will XYZ be available on VMS = will XYZ be available on VMS on all
>> supported platforms
> Personally, my perspective is that the only path forward for VSI is x86,
> for now, and any efforts on VAX, Alpha, and that sinking ship detract
> from what they need to be doing.
> Look at it this way. Back porting LLVM and compilers to older HW
> probably would cost more than just giving those needing it some new x86
> systems.
Given expected timelines then I completely agree.
When VMS x86-64 is production ready then the last Itanium
will be too old for new deployments.
Arne
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list