[Info-vax] Opportunity for VSI?
Scott Dorsey
kludge at panix.com
Sat Dec 15 16:08:21 EST 2018
Dave Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
>
>Makes one wonder, if DEC could get the required I/O performance on the
>32 bit systems, why couldn't they do so on the 32 bit systems?
Because it wasn't for that. The 32-bit systems weren't I/O engines, they
were CPU engines. They were entirely different systems with an entirely
different application, but the sales people didn't understand this.
I am sure DEC could have made a 32-bit I/O engine. They might even have
been able to make one with the Vax instruction set. But it wouldn't have
been directly Vax-compatible. There isn't as big a market for such a
machine, but it's a dedicated one.
>If the 36 bit systems were still here today, they would have evolved, as
>all others did, and would be as good or better than most.
Yes, much like the classic I/O engine system the IBM/360 did.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list