[Info-vax] Development Tooling (was: Re: Opportunity for VSI?)
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Mon Dec 17 11:14:15 EST 2018
On 2018-12-17 05:41:28 +0000, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply said:
> In article <pv6m04$c9f$1 at dont-email.me>, Stephen Hoffman
> <seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid> writes:
>> As you're almost certainly referencing compilers there, that's not been
>> a product differentiator in recent years,
>
> What about Fortran 2018?
What about it? VSI is not going to create a bespoke and
performance-competitive Fortran 2018 compiler.
Not going to happen.
VSI doesn't have the schedule or budget or staff for that.
The bespoke and performance-competitive compiler effort won't provide
enough incremental revenue over grafting the existing Fortran front-end
onto LLVM, and of adopting and contributing to flang as that evolves
forward.
>> You've indicated you're an EDT user. Go try LSEDIT. See how that
>> changes your approach to source code development. The keypad is that
>> of EDT (or EDT keypad can be selected), so what's new is the command
>> line interface in the editor, and a few shortcuts such as ^F and ^G in
>> the diagnostic review window after a COMPILE /REVIEW command.
>
> I've used LSEDIT a few times. I have a huge number of macros in EDT by
> now. I tend to have code in one window, make changes, save them (yes,
> via an EDT macro), compile, link, and run in another, and so on.
> Enough for me.
Sure. It works. But because you haven't used new tooling—much like
the glue-code that OpenVMS apps tend to accrete—the effort in your
existing approach is invisible to you.
I certainly hadn't recognized glue code as an issue, until I saw folks
working to reduce that. Nor recognized the down-revision tooling until
I'd used newer tooling, for that matter.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list