[Info-vax] Development Tooling

[Jan-Erik Söderholm]

Den 2018-12-18 kl. 14:21, skrev Craig A. Berry:
> 
> On 12/16/18 8:08 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 12/16/2018 8:50 PM, Kerry Main wrote:
>>>> From: Info-vax <info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com> On Behalf Of Arne Vajhøj
>>>> Sent: December 16, 2018 8:02 PM
>>>> The link said HP.
>>>>
>>>> That means that the page is hopeless outdated.
>>>>
>>>> If it said HPE then it may also be considered outdated.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Likely 75+% of HPE Customers still refer to HPE as HP (including most 
>>> contributors to c.o.v.)
>>>
>>> Outdated? If any company has been really bad in correcting its web 
>>> sites, its HPE.
>>>
>>> Anyway, the point is not the web site, its that there is a modern cross 
>>> platform IDE option for OpenVMS available today.
>>
>> I git that.
>>
>> My point is that this company also seems a bit behind updating their
>> web site (like HPE).
>>
>> That can be considered insignificant or be considered a sign of
>> potentially poor support depending on perspective.
> 
> I can't believe I'm agreeing with Kerry, but what he cited is about what
> HP did in 2014 as far as turning over the reins of VMS development to
> VSI.  It was still HP, not HPE, in 2014, right?

I also noticed that. The page is up-to-date regarding VSI and so on.
The "HP" refers back to a time before HPE, as far as I can see.
Or sould they claim that it was HPE that licensed VMS to VSI?
Would that be any better? Or would it just be plain wrong?


> 
> I'm more curious about the definition of "bundled" in the announcement
> of NXTware Remote being bundled with VMS a couple of years ago:
> 
> <https://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/03/prweb13299829.htm>
> 
> I'm guessing it does not mean included with your OS license but more
> like the inclusion of a free trial.
>