[Info-vax] Vax Station 4000 VLC

Simon Clubley clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Wed Dec 26 15:15:36 EST 2018


On 2018-12-25, Bill Gunshannon <bill.gunshannon at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/25/18 2:15 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 12/25/2018 2:18 AM, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
>>> In article <pvs0ti$1q65$1 at gioia.aioe.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?=
>>> <arne at vajhoej.dk> writes:
>>>> GUI is not really important for VMS.
>>>
>>> It depends on what one does with VMS.
>>>
>>>> Sure a newer X and GTK could be nice, but I don't think it would help
>>>> VSI sell a single VMS license.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure.  Obviously, people still on VMS are dependent on a modern
>>> GUI.  But it might open the door to some NEW customers.  It doesn't have
>>> to have all the bells and whistles.  A reasonably modern web browser
>>> would probably be enough.  :-|
>> 
>> You think there will be people willing to pay for a VMS license
>> for a box used for web browsing running VMS?
>> 
>> I don't see that as realistic.
>> 
>
> Maybe not, but people running VMS may want to browse the web
> without having to go to a different machine just for that one
> trivial task.
>

VMS should be viewed more as an embedded system that people connect
to remotely. In that situation, the device they are using to connect
to that VMS system already has multiple web browsers available for it.

Dropping a downloaded file on to that VMS server is no different from
transfering a file stored locally on another machine.

No-one sensible is going to be running a web browser directly on VMS
in production use.

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world



More information about the Info-vax mailing list