[Info-vax] Vax Station 4000 VLC

Arne Vajhøj arne at vajhoej.dk
Sat Dec 29 16:38:56 EST 2018


On 12/29/2018 12:13 PM, johnwallace4 at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On Friday, 28 December 2018 22:27:41 UTC, Arne Vajhøj  wrote:
>> On 12/28/2018 4:13 PM, johnwallace4 at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>> And things like the POSIX standards recently mentioned are
>>> neither open source nor really free.
>>>
>>> The POSIX standards are vendor neutral, and at one time were seen
>>> by some people as the way of the future, because POSIX-compliance
>>> would allow people and knowledge (and code and ...) to be usefully
>>> transferred between POSIX-compliant systems in a largely
>>> compatible way:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX
>>>
>>> Even VMS had a POSIX-compatibility subsystem (in the general
>>> sense).
>>>
>>> MS thought they would have to join the POSIX bandwagon, but
>>> in their usual fashion they didn't initially deliver much of
>>> technical relevance.
>>>
>>> Then when Redmond decided that they could again get away with
>>> not delivering much at all (given that the huge MS-dependent
>>> ecosystem would have little option other than to Follow The
>>> Leader), POSIX itself became less relevant.
>>
>> Windows NT and 2000 had an optional POSIX subsystem.
> 
> Windows NT and 2000 had an optional POSIX subsystem that was based
> on an early flavour of POSIX e.g. it didn't deliver POSIX threads
> and POSIX sockets. The difference between snake oil and "stuff that
> does useful things", perhaps. Nice work for those who can get away
> with it,

It is not easy being Microsoft.

POSIX.1 was created in 1988. Microsoft released POSIX for
Windows in 1993. POSIX.1c threads was created in 1995 and
POSIX sockets was added even later (2008??).

What did you expect MS to do? Invent a time machine so they
after those newer standards got defined could go back in time
and make their product compliant?

> Windows 10 (or whatever it's called) seems to have grown some kind
> of Ubuntu-compatibility layer. Will it still be there in two years
> time? Some people may not care, others whose products are intended
> to have a slightly longer lifetime might want to investigate further.

Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL).

It is a general Linux emulation where MS supports several
distros. Ubuntu was probably the first leading to the common
misconception that it is an Ubuntu thing.

Arne




More information about the Info-vax mailing list