[Info-vax] VMS First-Boot on x86 Contest
Paul Sture
nospam at sture.ch
Thu Feb 15 09:54:18 EST 2018
On 2018-02-15, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) <helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de> wrote:
> In article <34bgle-m3a2.ln1 at news2.chingola.ch>, Paul Sture
><nospam at sture.ch> writes:
>
>> > Hopefully VSI will change things so that a new VMS installation
>> > installs EVERYTHING. Disks are cheap. Really cheap. If necessary,
>> > some functionality could be restricted via licensing.
>>
>> No, we don't want EVERYTHING, we only want the components needed for
>> this instance's requirements. The attack surface area should be
>> kept to the minimum.
>
> We are talking 20 cents per GB or whatever. Is the effort to reduce the
> footprint really worth it?
We seem to be talking about two flavours of "Software Installation" here.
a) transfer the installation packages to disk e.g. copy the PCSI kits
to disk
b) actually install a given package in the VMSINSTAL or PRODUCT install
sense
What I am saying is that a) is OK, but automatically installing everything
in case b) is most definitely not a good idea.
--
If the brain was simple enough to understand, we'd be too simple to
understand it.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list