[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Den 2018-01-05 kl. 04:36, skrev Roger Blake:
> On 2018-01-04, chrisv <chrisv at nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Might I say that was an awesome post, sir.
> 
> His post was sheer idiocy. CO2 is not a pollutant - period.
> 

No, it is a natural part of the atmosphare, but it is a balance.
It has to be in the right proportions. To much (and in particual
if we continue to burn fosile fuels that ads carbone that was
bound millions of years ago) and the climate will be hurt.

> Human caused "climate change/global warming" is junk science at
> its worst. Even Reid Bryson, the scientist who was the father of
> modern climate science, stated that it is "a bunch of hooey."
> 

I could probably name the scientist that has the opposite view, but
the space in one posting would not be enough.

And why pick one that has been dead for 10 years? The views on global
warming has changed over the years and a lot has happend the last decade.

> As I said, I absolutely refuse to reduce my own carbon emissions and
> in fact continue to see ways to increase them.

OK. fine. You'll be sorry and your children will be hurt. But then, if
you could reduce your C02 emission, what would be the issue?

> (Do you dumbass hippies
> really believe that your stoopid windmills are solar panels are capable
> of keeping people warm and alive in the deep freeze that so much of the
> U.S. is currently experiencing?)

That weather phenomenon is probably also caused by the disturbed climate
caused by the CO2 emissions. So in the case of the current US weather
issues, you could say that it is, in a way, self-inflicted.

Anyway, you could probably start with more efficient cars, shutting down
all AC equipment and so on. This cold is just a temporarily storm and
has little to do with the overall climate issues. One can not use the
amount of snow on the back garden to judge about the climate at large.