[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

[cameo]

On 1/6/2018 11:53 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 09:35:50 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/5/2018 10:46 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:43:48 -0500, Alan Browne
>>> <bitbucket at blackhole.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-01-05 10:13, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 10:04:06 +0100, Peter Köhlmann
>>>>> <peter-koehlmann at t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Roger Blake wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2018-01-04, chrisv <chrisv at nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Might I say that was an awesome post, sir.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> His post was sheer idiocy. CO2 is not a pollutant - period.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Human caused "climate change/global warming" is junk science at
>>>>>>> its worst.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Idiot
>>>>>
>>>>> Another thought-provoking and irrefutable post by Mainz's greatest
>>>>> export, Peter the Klöwn.
>>>>
>>>> A funny thing about your sort is you believe that putting down others
>>>> makes your point valid and that resonates in your little echo chambers
>>>> as some sort of truth.
>>>
>>> Says the hypocrite who just defended someone calling another poster an
>>> "idiot."
>>>
>>>> While there is wisdom in crowds...
>>>
>>> ... there is none in your posts.
>>>
>>> *plonk*
>>>
>>
>> Like the rest of the science deniers, go ahead and stick your head back
>> in the sand.
> 
> I'm not a science denier, but I do deny results which come from a
> hand-picked set of scientists. If 1,000 scientists are asked about
> climate and 100 of them say that humans are causing global warming, is
> it honest to grab those 100 and then claim that 100% of scientists
> believe in global warming?
> 
> I don't believe that it is and yet that's what happened.
> 
Yes, but what can those 100 scientist do if they depend on supporting 
polititians' goverment grants?