[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

Doomsdrzej dre at do.om
Mon Jan 8 11:50:13 EST 2018


On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 16:06:23 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam at gmail.com> wrote:

>On 1/6/2018 11:53 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 09:35:50 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 1/5/2018 10:46 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 10:43:48 -0500, Alan Browne
>>>> <bitbucket at blackhole.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-01-05 10:13, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 10:04:06 +0100, Peter Köhlmann
>>>>>> <peter-koehlmann at t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roger Blake wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2018-01-04, chrisv <chrisv at nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Might I say that was an awesome post, sir.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> His post was sheer idiocy. CO2 is not a pollutant - period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Human caused "climate change/global warming" is junk science at
>>>>>>>> its worst.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Idiot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another thought-provoking and irrefutable post by Mainz's greatest
>>>>>> export, Peter the Klöwn.
>>>>>
>>>>> A funny thing about your sort is you believe that putting down others
>>>>> makes your point valid and that resonates in your little echo chambers
>>>>> as some sort of truth.
>>>>
>>>> Says the hypocrite who just defended someone calling another poster an
>>>> "idiot."
>>>>
>>>>> While there is wisdom in crowds...
>>>>
>>>> ... there is none in your posts.
>>>>
>>>> *plonk*
>>>>
>>>
>>> Like the rest of the science deniers, go ahead and stick your head back
>>> in the sand.
>> 
>> I'm not a science denier, but I do deny results which come from a
>> hand-picked set of scientists. If 1,000 scientists are asked about
>> climate and 100 of them say that humans are causing global warming, is
>> it honest to grab those 100 and then claim that 100% of scientists
>> believe in global warming?
>> 
>> I don't believe that it is and yet that's what happened.
>> 
>
>Since the 100 you speak of are the climate scientists of the bunch, you 
>should pay most attention to them. Ignore the christian scientists and 
>other such.

Proof?



More information about the Info-vax mailing list