[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Den 2018-01-09 kl. 22:41, skrev Tim Streater:
> In article <p32p4a$32u$1 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm
> <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote:
> 
>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 14:16, skrev Tim Streater:
>>> In article <p32eir$3r6$3 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm
>>> <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 10:58, skrev Tim Streater:
>>>>> In article <WOT4C.274768$BH4.101809 at fx02.iad>, Wolf K
>>>>> <wolfmac at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-01-08 14:59, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> If you run the gasoline engine on bio-fuels produced from plants
>>>>>>> growing *today*, there is no issue with the C02 emissions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a net addition to the CO2 load, because it costs energy (ie, 
>>>>>> fuel) to produce the biofuel. That cost can be stated as the 
>>>>>> proportion of the fuel needed to produce it. That is, how many litres 
>>>>>> of some fuel does it take to produce 100 litres of the stuff?
>>>>>
>>>>> And how much land to produce the 100 litres each year every year? Or to
>>>>> produce enough biofuel for one vehicle's annual driving?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What kind of "vehicle"? You can probably forget all those V8's...
>>>>
>>>> No, bio-fuel is not the only solution. There will be other fueld
>>>> neededf and at the samre time another way to "build" our communities
>>>> that does not need the amount of car travels as today.
>>>>
>>>> And bio-fuel is not only about growing stuff out on the fields, it
>>>> is also gas produced from ordinary household waste.
>>>
>>> Biofuel is not a solution at all.
> 
>> So then, what is the solution to get rid of the fossil fuels?
> 
> Nuclear. Much the safest and reliable.
> 

Nuclear is a dead end and pushing the issues with waste storage onto
many future generations. The nuclear *plans* are quite OK when in
production but a real pain to decommission.