[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Den 2018-01-10 kl. 00:11, skrev Tim Streater:
> In article <p33f34$2kk$4 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm
> <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote:
> 
>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 22:47, skrev Tim Streater:
>> > In article <v96a5dlvf4fhhir13an7fgq7f2fmgad4tf at 4ax.com>, Doomsdrzej
>> > <dre at do.om> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Solar, thermal, wind, and for consistency, nuclear.
>> >>
>> >> The first three are worthless ...
>> >
>> > Right so far.
>> >
>> >> ...and the last is the most dangerous thing on Earth.
>> >
>> > Total balls.
>> >
>> > At TMI...
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> > and Fukushima, no one killed or injured.
>>
>> That is simply not according official reports. There was a number of
>> workers killed at the plan directly in the accident.
> 
> No such reports have been seen in the press.
> 
>> And the number
>> of deads reported or calculated in the time after the accident such
>> as during the evacuation process (caused by the cuclear accident)
>> has been in the 1000 range.
> 
> If the Japanese panicked and made a mess of the unnecessary evacuation
> that's hardly the fault of nuclear power. The problem is that people
> have been lied to about the scale of the danger.
> 
>> > At Chernobyl (where they had to work very hard to make even a poorly
>> > designed reactor have a meltdown), less than 100 dead....
>>
>> There seems to be reports of approx. 40 directly dead by the explosion as
>> such. Then the figures varies a lot, since it is very hard to guess the
>> final impact. The estimates seems to be in the 9,000 to 90,000 range:
> 
> Not according to to the World Health Organisation, whose study in the
> mid-90s concluded 75 dead to be the most likely figure.
> 

To quote from the link that you snipped from the post:

"The final death toll from Chernobyl is subject to speculation, due to
the long-term effects of radiation. Estimates range from 9,000 by the
World Health Organization to one of a possible 90,000 by the
environmental group Greenpeace."

Here is the link again:

https://nypost.com/2017/11/20/scientists-might-have-been-wrong-about-the-chernobyl-disaster/

Please provide a current link to the figure of 75 by WHO.