[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

[Wolf K]

On 2018-01-10 00:59, DaveFroble wrote:
> Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 22:41, skrev Tim Streater:
>>> In article <p32p4a$32u$1 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm
>>> <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 14:16, skrev Tim Streater:
>>>>> In article <p32eir$3r6$3 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm
>>>>> <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 10:58, skrev Tim Streater:
>>>>>>> In article <WOT4C.274768$BH4.101809 at fx02.iad>, Wolf K
>>>>>>> <wolfmac at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2018-01-08 14:59, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>> If you run the gasoline engine on bio-fuels produced from plants
>>>>>>>>> growing *today*, there is no issue with the C02 emissions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is a net addition to the CO2 load, because it costs energy 
>>>>>>>> (ie, fuel) to produce the biofuel. That cost can be stated as 
>>>>>>>> the proportion of the fuel needed to produce it. That is, how 
>>>>>>>> many litres of some fuel does it take to produce 100 litres of 
>>>>>>>> the stuff?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And how much land to produce the 100 litres each year every year? 
>>>>>>> Or to
>>>>>>> produce enough biofuel for one vehicle's annual driving?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What kind of "vehicle"? You can probably forget all those V8's...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, bio-fuel is not the only solution. There will be other fueld
>>>>>> neededf and at the samre time another way to "build" our communities
>>>>>> that does not need the amount of car travels as today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And bio-fuel is not only about growing stuff out on the fields, it
>>>>>> is also gas produced from ordinary household waste.
>>>>>
>>>>> Biofuel is not a solution at all.
>>>
>>>> So then, what is the solution to get rid of the fossil fuels?
>>>
>>> Nuclear. Much the safest and reliable.
>>>
>>
>> Nuclear is a dead end and pushing the issues with waste storage onto
>> many future generations. The nuclear *plans* are quite OK when in
>> production but a real pain to decommission.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> So then, it's just an engineering issue, right?
> 
> Better design, better planning, and such.
> 
> Just where did that waste come from?  Some aliens shipped it in from off 
> planet?  It came from right here.  It should be a manageable problem.

The cheapest way to manage nuclear waste is dilution and burial. 
However, the chemistry may a greater problem than the radioactivity. Eg, 
Pu is one of the more poisonous heavy metals.

-- 
Wolf K
kirkwood40.blogspot.com
"The next conference for the time travel design team will be held two 
weeks ago."