[Info-vax] Making the CRTL version dependency information useful

[Craig A. Berry]

On 1/13/18 3:02 PM, John Reagan wrote:
> Let me know if you'd like me to tweak that in the future.  I'd be
> willing to provide some other representation as well.  A CSV file or
> some easily processed?

Thanks. I think this works well enough for what you guys inherited from
HP. I assume v8.5 will have a sizable list of new functions, and
depending on what those look like in online help, I may need to revisit
it. If the DocBook-based documentation becomes available then, parsing
that might be the most robust solution.

Side note: I hope the socket library docs get integrated with the CRTL
docs as the functions themselves were integrated into the CRTL quite
some time ago. It would also be nice to see a "first available in
<version>" line added to each function's description.