[Info-vax] Tangent about DECnet versions.
Jan-Erik Söderholm
jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com
Mon May 21 04:57:33 EDT 2018
Den 2018-05-21 kl. 02:58, skrev Stephen Hoffman:
> On 2018-05-20 06:37:11 +0000, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply said:
>
>> In article <pdqfff$g6c$1 at dont-email.me>, Dave Froble
>> <davef at tsoft-inc.com> writes:
>>
>>> There is not much of a reason to run DECnet on production systems. If
>>> you're going to communicate with trading aprtners, your options are
>>> TCP/IP and not much else.
>>>
>>> Now on development environments, DECnet can be helpful.
>>>
>>> One thing I find very helpful is BACKUP over the network. For me, the
>>> capabilities are much better than TCP/IP.
>
> There's also that BACKUP and other parts of OpenVMS haven't yet adopted and
> integrated IP networking, sure. Hopefully IP integration gets looked at
> sooner rather than later.
>
> There's also that OpenVMS doesn't offer nor commonly use remote file shares
> via IP, outside of NFS. No SMB, no WebDAV, etc...
See the second PDF from the top here: http://wasd.vsm.com.au/other/
"Implementing a WebDAV Server using WASD on OpenVMS".
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list