[Info-vax] The best VMS features, was: Re: openvms renaming file

Dave Froble davef at tsoft-inc.com
Mon May 28 22:11:56 EDT 2018


On 5/28/2018 2:56 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2018-05-28, Dave Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think so.  RMS indexed files allow concurrent use, using the DLM.
>>
>> The problem with RMS isn't the design, it's the implementation.  Modern
>> RDBMS systems do much of their work in memory.  RMS does the work on
>> disk.  Quite a large difference in speed, as one might expect.
>>
>> Re-implement RMS in the same manner and you'd see totally different
>> performance.  Ya got to remember how old the design and implementation
>> of RMS is.  40 years ago it worked well.
>>
>
> RMS ISAM files would still be very limited compared to a database,
> even MySQL.

Quite right!  RMS and similar worked in the past.  New designs have 
bypassed them.

> For example, compare what is involved in adding a new field to
> a database compared to what is involved in adding that same field
> to a RMS ISAM file.

As one good example.  Nor do I expect that the operation is all that 
simple internally, but, the internal procedures exist.  Any changes to 
strictly record based databases usually require detailed custom work.




More information about the Info-vax mailing list