[Info-vax] OpenSSL CSWS-2.2-1
Dave Froble
davef at tsoft-inc.com
Sat Apr 6 21:25:17 EDT 2019
On 4/6/2019 8:17 PM, Robert A. Brooks wrote:
> On 4/6/2019 6:54 PM, terry-groups at glaver.org wrote:
>> On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 1:24:05 PM UTC-4, Stephen Hoffman wrote:
>>> The current OpenVMS CSWS version is based on Apache HTTP Server V2.4-38.
>>
>> Is it really that up-to-date? I'd be amazed. A Google search for "OpenVMS
>> CSWS" leads me to
>> https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=a00058394en_us
>> which
>> says it is based on Apache 2.0.65, and took apparently nearly a year
>> and a
>> half (based on June 2013 release date from the Apache Foundation and an
>> October 2014 date on the HP release notes).
>
> We (VSI) have a much more current version of Apache, although I'd be
> hard-pressed to tell you what that is. I suspect the version that Steve
> referred to is ours.
That was my impression.
>> The three things I think HP got wrong (and Compaq and DEC before them)
>> are:
>
>> 1) Thinking that "port once and done" is a workable solution, and when
>> they
>> find out it isn't, making another "port once and done" effort. This is
>> something that needs to continuously track the upstream branch.
>
> We are not going the DEC/CPQ/HP way. We've got a group of people
> who are dedicated to open source work. The current big effort is with
> Samba.
> I'm pretty sure that OpenSSL V1.1.1 is also underway.
I'm in the process of installing and learning a bit about Mark Daniel's
WASD web server. Included, and optional, is the (I believe) OpenSSL
V1.1.1. At least it is claimed to do TLS V1.3.
Now, I have no idea if it is a complete port of OpenSSL, or, just enough
for WASD. Might be worth checking out, and if Mark can provide VMS
users with a good port of OpenSSL, why not take advantage of that?
--
David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA 15486
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list