[Info-vax] Intersystems Caché on VSI OpenVMS?

[Forster, Michael]

Interesting and reassuring though what happens when you need to call the application vendor for support and they state that you are on an unsupported configuration? And since you are, even though you have been paying for support, they can't assist.

I won't mention vendors as Paul hasn't and I haven't asked him however as an example in a previous life, we brought good things to life.

You and I are in the same application vendor space at times we both know. Perhaps your testing is not for the vendor I'm thinking?

Michael Forster
Enterprise Storage and IDX Architect | Information Services
Medical College of Wisconsin
O: (414) 955-4967 |  mforster at mcw.edu

________________________________________
From: Info-vax <info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com> on behalf of John.Spitkovsky_at_mscsinc.com via Info-vax <info-vax at rbnsn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 4:14:00 PM
To: info-vax at rbnsn.com
Cc: John.Spitkovsky_at_mscsinc.com
Subject: Re: [Info-vax]  Intersystems Caché on VSI OpenVMS?

ATTENTION: This email originated from a sender outside of MCW. Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
________________________________

On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 1:37:39 PM UTC-5, pcov... at gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 2:20:17 PM UTC-4, John.Spitkovsky_at_mscsinc.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 10:34:31 AM UTC-5, pcov... at gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 11:22:04 AM UTC-4, Stephen Hoffman wrote:
> > > > On 2019-04-02 14:53:26 +0000, Jim said:
> > > >
> > > > > Cache DBMS? Ask again... I believe their plans have changed to include
> > > > > continued support of VMS.
> > > >
> > > > If the InterSystems folks have changed their existing 2017.1 plans,
> > > > then they're very quiet about it, and haven't clarified nor corrected
> > > > existing notices:
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.intersystems.com_post_platform-2Dcompatibility-2Dhp-2Dopen-2Dvms&d=DwICAg&c=aFamLAsxMIDYjNglYHTMV0iqFn3z4pVFYPQkjgspw4Y&r=2i3Iy38OaXCqI2PNgrM4Aw&m=AehY5g3x5drRJSPpgD-1yglr_qSTntpvnuiqcjxaESE&s=O4MuyiyqBMJXfYlOBHaQPDXkRd9OX3VAV2IoOmC85FM&e=
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.intersystems.com_post_vsi-2Dopenvms&d=DwICAg&c=aFamLAsxMIDYjNglYHTMV0iqFn3z4pVFYPQkjgspw4Y&r=2i3Iy38OaXCqI2PNgrM4Aw&m=AehY5g3x5drRJSPpgD-1yglr_qSTntpvnuiqcjxaESE&s=6-vTCCat66srYPMwP-6YI4_ecrAqSEwxjX5levLQW2w&e=
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blog.intersystems.com_compatibility_&d=DwICAg&c=aFamLAsxMIDYjNglYHTMV0iqFn3z4pVFYPQkjgspw4Y&r=2i3Iy38OaXCqI2PNgrM4Aw&m=AehY5g3x5drRJSPpgD-1yglr_qSTntpvnuiqcjxaESE&s=PFZOcFnD82MQHqRvZwhujNJM-GfpLbrIxktm_NNz_RQ&e=
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
> > >
> > > I just looked also with no luck, I did send off an inquiry into it from there website.
> > >
> > > I do have plans on testing 8.4-1H1 but just not there yet, but with no plans after that it's a hard sell to management to continue along that path.
> >
> > If it helps, I just took a site running Cache 2012.1.5.956.0.12956 and upgraded from HPE OpenVMS V8.4 to VSI V8.4-1H1.  All is still running perfectly and the app users agree!
>
> depends really on management. what are you running for hardware? and what application?  any performance improvements?  we are on 2015.1 of cache.
>
> Intersystems is checking on the possibility of using 8.4-2. which would help.

If it helps, I just successfully upgraded the site mentioned above (running Cache 2012.1.5) from VSI OpenVMS 8.2-1H1 to VSI OpenVMS V8.4-2L1.  Users report the application running just fine.
_______________________________________________
Info-vax mailing list
Info-vax at rbnsn.com
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rbnsn.com_mailman_listinfo_info-2Dvax-5Frbnsn.com&d=DwICAg&c=aFamLAsxMIDYjNglYHTMV0iqFn3z4pVFYPQkjgspw4Y&r=2i3Iy38OaXCqI2PNgrM4Aw&m=AehY5g3x5drRJSPpgD-1yglr_qSTntpvnuiqcjxaESE&s=_5TYjXf1zfYs4rF-B5EuWAG3Bd-JZ38UGO2EYNHTGGI&e=