[Info-vax] VMware

[Jean-François Piéronne]

Le 09/12/2019 à 03:37, Kerry Main a écrit :
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Info-vax <info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com> On Behalf Of clair.grant---
>> via Info-vax
>> Sent: December 8, 2019 9:07 PM
>> To: info-vax at rbnsn.com
>> Cc: clair.grant at vmssoftware.com <clairgrant71 at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Info-vax] VMware
>>
>> On Sunday, December 8, 2019 at 7:56:45 PM UTC-5, Grant Taylor wrote:
>>> On 12/8/19 1:24 PM, clair.grant at vmssoftware.com wrote:
>>>> As I have said hundreds of times,
>>>
>>> I feel like you answered a different question than the one that I was
>>> intending to ask.
>>>
>>> I was intending to ask about how much of a difference in the
>>> hypervisors was a problem for you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Grant. . . .
>>> unix || die
>>
>> Don't know yet. Once we get booted then we can compare Fusion to VBox
>> and kvm.
> 
> While getting official support for VMware would be great, the other solution
> that I would like to see is the KVM flavour as it seems like it would be a
> natural fit for HCI technologies from companies like Nutanix.
> 
> Nutanix HCI solutions are very hot these days for Customers who are looking
> for an option to reduce their high VMware costs.
> 
> <https://www.nutanix.com/products/acropolis>
> 
> The Nutanix hypervisor is free and is based on KVM. Customers seem to like
> the solution as well. You get very high VM counts on relatively small
> servers.
> 
> Nutanix-HPE are also very close so ProLiant support is well integrated:
> <https://www.nutanix.com/hpe>
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kerry Main
> Kerry dot main at starkgaming dot com
> 
> 
> 
> 
We use Proxmox (https://www.proxmox.com/), also based on KVM, for many 
years and on one site running more than 100 VMs.

Regards,

Jean-François