[Info-vax] x86-64 VMS executable image sizes and memory requirements ?
John Reagan
xyzzy1959 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 18 22:05:15 EST 2019
On Wednesday, December 18, 2019 at 8:21:55 PM UTC-5, Simon Clubley wrote:
> Now that VSI are starting to get user level programs such as EDT
> running, I was wondering how the x86-64 VMS image sizes and memory
> usage compares to other VMS architectures.
>
> Or is it still too early to get enough data to be meaningful ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon.
>
> --
> Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
> Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.
We're building everything NOOPTIMIZE so it isn't worth looking at.
That said,
EDTSHR.EXE, Alpha, optimized: 493 blocks on disk, 179,712 bytes of code
EDTSHR.EXE, Itanium, optimized: 724 blocks on disk, 302,960 bytes of code
EDTSHR.EXE, x86, NOT optimized: 589 blocks on disk, 227,120 bytes of code
and don't ask about x86 optimization. We haven't even built the LLVM optimizer. We won't bother until we get native compilers in place.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list