[Info-vax] Most popular application programming languages on VMS ?

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 1/11/2019 8:18 PM, Dave Froble wrote:
> On 1/11/2019 5:15 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 1/11/2019 9:05 AM, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
>>> On 1/11/19 8:40 AM, John Reagan wrote:
>>>> This isn't much different to posting photos online.  You retain
>>>> copyright ownership even if you don't slap on some notice or
>>>> overprint image.
>>>
>>> And, ignores the fact that just because I slap my
>>> copyright on something and claim I own it does not
>>> make it so.  And that has to be verified as well
>>> before it can be used commercially.
>>
>> It is certainly a feasible scenario that someone
>> submit some open source that the person do not
>> own copyright on.
>>
>> It is also a feasible scenario that you
>> hire someone to write some code and that
>> person get some code from elsewhere
>> without permission and claim it is
>> original.
>>
>> And it is also a feasible scenario that
>> you buy commercial binary software and
>> the company has included software that
>> it is not entitled to.
>>
>> You can only be 100% sure that such is not
>> the case if you either write all code your
>> self or watch somebody else write all
>> the code.
>>
>> For less than 100% sure then taking open
>> source that has been public announced among
>> the domain experts is probably the least risky
>> scenario in this regard, because the risk
>> of getting caught is the highest.
> 
>  From what I'm reading here, in the opinion of some, there can not be 
> any type of code that is considered "owned".  Can't trust anyone who has 
> written code, including employees, because they might have used, or just 
> read, copyrighted code.
> 
> Not that it means a damn thing, but my opinion is "bullshit!"

My point was that there is always some risk, but that the
risk from using open source should not be assumed bigger
than the risk of using anything else.

Arne