[Info-vax] C99 stuff (Re: The Road to V9.0)
Dave Froble
davef at tsoft-inc.com
Sat Jun 8 12:37:20 EDT 2019
On 6/8/2019 10:48 AM, Robert A. Brooks wrote:
> On 6/7/2019 10:08 PM, Dave Froble wrote:
>> On 6/7/2019 5:22 PM, Robert A. Brooks wrote:
>>> On 6/7/2019 3:48 PM, IanD wrote:
>>>> The hobbyist program is eagerly awaited
>>>>
>>>> [...] I've seen little evidence even the new code VSI has written
>>>> for VMS
>>>> will be open sourced.
>>>
>>> It's not going to happen; give it up.
>>>
>>
>> Just curious Rob, is that a business decision, or determined by prior
>> legal agreements? I've read before that what VSI writes is their own
>> property.
>
> While what we write is ours, what we write is useless without what
> DEC/CPQ/HP(E)
> has written. Much of the kernel is unchanged from what we've received
> from HPE.
>
> While the port to X86_64 has required a lot of new stuff (memory
> management, for example, is a big area of change), layered products
> (non-compilers), process management, utilities (COPY, DIRECTORY, PCSI,
> etc...) are largely unchanged.
>
> You could not do anything with just the stuff we've written.
>
I agree, and didn't ask that anything be released.
The original question was about "new code", and that is specifically
what my question was about. I'm not interested in seeing it happen. I
was wondering if there were any restrictions on what VSI writes, and if
VSI has a policy of not releasing code they write. I agree, little
pieces here and there aren't of much independent value.
--
David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA 15486
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list