[Info-vax] User Interface Design, Implementation

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 6/7/2019 9:56 PM, Richard Maher wrote:
> On 8/06/2019 7:37 am, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 6/7/2019 5:35 AM, Richard Maher wrote:
>>> On 7/06/2019 8:54 am, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> But yes - no V - or you can say that V is moved to client tier.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand some JS frameworks talk about full MVC client side:
>>>> AngularJS, Ember etc..
>>>
>>> Can someone **please** explain to my why they would willing handicap 
>>> a project with AngularJS React/Redux or Vue??????
>>>
>>> TypeScript, Node, NPM, Bootstrap, Babel transpiling/dumbing down your 
>>> code to previous versions, Lint, LowDash, Wank . . .
>>>
>>> What do you perceive Angular, React, and Vue do for you? Apart from 
>>> wreck your app's performance and team productivity.
>>>
>>> Turn on debug and just see how many unnecessary times your Render() 
>>> method is called.
>>
>> I don't think I have the experience to argue exactly what value those
>> frameworks provide.
> 
> Evidently :-)
> 
>> I can observe that the majority of client side developers use
>> those frameworks.
> 
> Yes, and every job advertised wants them 'cos Gartner or some other dick 
> lied to them that they were "modern" javascript Frameworks.
> 
> Long before PWAs and Custom Elements.
> 
> Facebook doesn't even use AngularJS on Apps that count and then blames 
> the web for being too slow.
> 
> Like jQuery Angular/React's time has come and gone.

When the vast majority pick a given solution and stick
to it consistently over the years, then I start to think that
maybe the solution do provide some value.

:-)

Arne