[Info-vax] User Interface Design, Implementation

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 6/8/2019 11:24 PM, Dave Froble wrote:
> On 6/8/2019 7:50 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> On 6/7/2019 9:56 PM, Richard Maher wrote:
>>> On 8/06/2019 7:37 am, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>> On 6/7/2019 5:35 AM, Richard Maher wrote:
>>>>> On 7/06/2019 8:54 am, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>>>> But yes - no V - or you can say that V is moved to client tier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the other hand some JS frameworks talk about full MVC client side:
>>>>>> AngularJS, Ember etc..
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone **please** explain to my why they would willing handicap
>>>>> a project with AngularJS React/Redux or Vue??????
>>>>>
>>>>> TypeScript, Node, NPM, Bootstrap, Babel transpiling/dumbing down
>>>>> your code to previous versions, Lint, LowDash, Wank . . .
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you perceive Angular, React, and Vue do for you? Apart from
>>>>> wreck your app's performance and team productivity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Turn on debug and just see how many unnecessary times your Render()
>>>>> method is called.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think I have the experience to argue exactly what value those
>>>> frameworks provide.
>>>
>>> Evidently :-)
>>>
>>>> I can observe that the majority of client side developers use
>>>> those frameworks.
>>>
>>> Yes, and every job advertised wants them 'cos Gartner or some other
>>> dick lied to them that they were "modern" javascript Frameworks.
>>>
>>> Long before PWAs and Custom Elements.
>>>
>>> Facebook doesn't even use AngularJS on Apps that count and then blames
>>> the web for being too slow.
>>>
>>> Like jQuery Angular/React's time has come and gone.
>>
>> When the vast majority pick a given solution and stick
>> to it consistently over the years, then I start to think that
>> maybe the solution do provide some value.
> 
> Or the "vast majority" (not yet established as fact) just don't know any 
> better?

Possible.

But there are always lots of people that think they are smarter
than everybody else. There are far fewer that actually are.

Arne