[Info-vax] User Interface Design, Implementation

[Richard Maher]

On 9/06/2019 7:50 am, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 6/7/2019 9:56 PM, Richard Maher wrote:
>> On 8/06/2019 7:37 am, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> On 6/7/2019 5:35 AM, Richard Maher wrote:
>>>> On 7/06/2019 8:54 am, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>>>> But yes - no V - or you can say that V is moved to client tier.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand some JS frameworks talk about full MVC client side:
>>>>> AngularJS, Ember etc..
>>>>
>>>> Can someone **please** explain to my why they would willing handicap 
>>>> a project with AngularJS React/Redux or Vue??????
>>>>
>>>> TypeScript, Node, NPM, Bootstrap, Babel transpiling/dumbing down 
>>>> your code to previous versions, Lint, LowDash, Wank . . .
>>>>
>>>> What do you perceive Angular, React, and Vue do for you? Apart from 
>>>> wreck your app's performance and team productivity.
>>>>
>>>> Turn on debug and just see how many unnecessary times your Render() 
>>>> method is called.
>>>
>>> I don't think I have the experience to argue exactly what value those
>>> frameworks provide.
>>
>> Evidently :-)
>>
>>> I can observe that the majority of client side developers use
>>> those frameworks.
>>
>> Yes, and every job advertised wants them 'cos Gartner or some other 
>> dick lied to them that they were "modern" javascript Frameworks.
>>
>> Long before PWAs and Custom Elements.
>>
>> Facebook doesn't even use AngularJS on Apps that count and then blames 
>> the web for being too slow.
>>
>> Like jQuery Angular/React's time has come and gone.
> 
> When the vast majority pick a given solution and stick
> to it consistently over the years, then I start to think that
> maybe the solution do provide some value.

You mean like COBOL, Java, ASP, jQuery, McDonalds?

And here was I thinking Computing was a science and not based on hearsay 
and superstition :-(

Mo one ever got fired for choosing IBM, React, and Angular? What a cock.

> 
> :-)
> 
> Arne
>