[Info-vax] Other than Oracle, What MySQL/DBMS options are there for OpenVms?

[Jan-Erik Söderholm]

Den 2019-03-26 kl. 00:31, skrev Arne Vajhøj:
> On 3/25/2019 4:27 PM, Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote:
>> Den 2019-03-25 kl. 20:37, skrev Denys Beauchemin:
>>> Jon was exactly correct, I apologize for not being clearer in my
>>> original answer.  Yes, the Postgres client works very well on OpenVMS
>>> and allows the application on OpenVMS to have full communication with a
>>> Postgres server on any platform that supports it.
>>>
>>> We are helping customers transform their OpenVMS code from Rdb access to
>>> Postgres access and that way the application can remain on OpenVMS for
>>> the foreseeable future.
>>
>> Why would staying with Rdb be an issue for staying with VMS?
>> Apart from the costs, of course.
> 
> Cost if often a very important factor in business
> decisions.
> 
> Besides that and with the caveat of not knowing much about
> neither RDB nor PostgreSQL, then I would expect RDB to be
> lacking some features among what has become common in
> databases within the last 20 years.
> 

Yes, there might be some features not available in Rdb, but I'd
say that most of those are not part of the traditional VMS
applications anyway.

And you must also look at the features that Rdb has that are not
available in other database (available on or as a client from VMS).
Such as the high stability and availabilty, the ease of use, the
high integration with VMS and VMS compilers.

> If you say that >90% of users do not need those
> features, then I will say that you are probably right.
> 

That is probably so, yes.


> :-)
> 
> Arne