[Info-vax] inertia or fundamentals about langages?

gérard Calliet gerard.calliet at pia-sofer.fr
Tue May 21 14:30:48 EDT 2019


TL;DR
Your "answer": 997 words
My text: 571 words

So I can conclude your TL;DR is somehow wrong

To jump at the provisional conclusive application of an idea you don't 
bother reading cannot also make any sense.

Just say: "I have my certitudes and my encyclopedy, so you are wrong". 
Not my idea about discussion.

More seriously:
(1) you prove my idea: TL;DR is typically just idiomatic for a non-US people
(2) you don't save your concept of inertia for VSI ; this concep is a 
lot more non efficient for the future of VSI ; I didn't say thinking the 
right way about fundamental errors about porting will be the unique 
business for VSI ; I just evaluate the meaning of the site we will not 
port outside and which are now a major part of the VSI business ; no the 
major part now of the VSI business is not made of lazy melancholics ; it 
is made of clever professional who know a lot about fundamentals in 
computer science ; and because they are clever lasting on VMS they'll 
prove intrinsic value of VMS ; and because of that VSI business will 
develop.

198 words







More information about the Info-vax mailing list