[Info-vax] SOLVED : Re: Process quota problem after upgrade to 8.4-2L1
Phillip Helbig undress to reply
helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de
Tue Dec 22 18:40:21 EST 2020
In article <rrtpi5$nb3$1 at dont-email.me>, Dave Froble
<davef at tsoft-inc.com> writes:
> On 12/22/2020 4:29 PM, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
> > In article <rrt30e$aua$1 at dont-email.me>, Stephen Hoffman
> > <seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid> writes:
> >
> >> Cluster satellite workstations are also not configurations I'd expect
> >> to see a whole lot of usage or testing, generally. I'd expect little
> >> usage of these configurations outside of hobbyist environments.
> >
> > Probably true today. On the other hand, they tend to be rebooted once a
> > day rather than once a decade, so non-dynamic parameters can be tested.
> >
> >> We'd
> >> see yet fewer of these cases too, if OpenVMS were better about its
> >> installation and re-installation and provisioning and which would ease
> >> cloning
> >
> > I would really like the ability to do an upgrade to the OS without
> > affecting any customized settings.
>
> Ummm ... how can I say this?
>
> You should really avoid customization of an OS, unless you're the OS
> developer. I consider doing so is just asking for problems, both while
> using the OS, and most definitely when upgrading.
I'm talking about things like mounting disks, my TCPIP configuration,
and so on.
> My practice is to insert required startup tasks in SYSTARTUP_VMS.COM,
> which is preserved during an upgrade. Any more would require convincing
> needs.
Yes, they are preserved. But, say, you have cluster-common stuff on
another disk, which has to be mounted earlier. Yes, there is the
.TEMPLATE and .COM. But on the other hand if one never touches the
user-modified files, one would never use any new functionality in the
templates.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list