[Info-vax] DECUServe is a Hobbyist Chapter
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Sat Jul 4 15:53:14 EDT 2020
On 2020-07-04 17:29:29 +0000, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply said:
> In article <rdqd6l$f66$1 at panix2.panix.com>, kludge at panix.com (Scott
> Dorsey) writes:
>
>> Yes, splitting decnet off was a big advance. But in a perfect world,
>> every part of the system would be a layered product and they would all
>> just layer on top of one another. It took the Unix world many decades
>> before Solaris was built this way, but now it's become quite ordinary
>> there. The ability to build a system that has just the pieces that you
>> need is a big deal in the modern world where people use the same OS for
>> radically different applications.
>
> Not that long ago, I remember people here complaining that TCPIP was
> not an integral part of VMS, even that a Webserver wasn't an integral
> part, that all of that stuff should be installed, set up, and
> configured by default. :-|
And telnet and a web server should absolutely be part of the base
installation of OpenVMS.
Not as layered products.
Getting rid of old apps and insecure apps and insecure protocols is an
ongoing investment.
So too is upgrading the default features provided.
As for a package manager, that's something that would be greatly
appreciated, but I'd rather see some of the core networking and
security issues fixed first, before introducing a package manager into
the fray.
The sorts of features and capabilities that a package manager would
depend on, and the sorts of features and capabilities that would reduce
or eliminate apps needing to splatter their parts all over the OpenVMS
system environment and as has been longstanding app practice.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list