[Info-vax] VAX VMS going forward

[Hans Bachner]

Chris Scheers schrieb am 18.07.2020 um 21:26:
> John H. Reinhardt wrote:
>> On 7/17/2020 6:02 PM, Dave Froble wrote:
>>
>>> Now who thinks HPe will give a damn and spend one red cent on any 
>>> legal action?
>>>
>>> Rather than a "rabbit full", why not a single license usable by anyone?
>>>
>>
>> Because, as you should know, there is no one license PAK for 
>> everything.  VAX/VMS needs a PAK.  x users or unlimited users needs 
>> another PAK.  DECnet needs a PAK. UCX/TCPIP needs a PAK.  VAXcluster 
>> needs a PAK.  Volume Shadowing needs a PAK.  BASIC needs a PAK.  Cobol 
>> needs a PAK.  Fortran needs a PAK. Pascal needs a PAK.  Get where I'm 
>> going?  Maybe not the 107 PAKS that came with the Hobbyist bundle 
>> (Does anyone really need HANZI DW-Motif?) but still a goodly number of 
>> different PAKs will be required.
>>
>>> I think Terry deserves an "atta-boy" for this information.
> 
> FWIW: The VAX Portfolio PAK covers many (most?) of the layered products.

I'm unaware of any "VAX Portfolio PAK" - what is this?

The only PAKs I know that cover multiple products are the 
NET-APP-SUP-nnn PAKs whoch include things like DECnet, TCP/IP, 
DECwindows, VMScluster and others depending on the value of "nnn".

Hans.