[Info-vax] The Doom of VAX VMS Hobbyist Licenses?
David Wade
g4ugm at dave.invalid
Mon Jul 20 18:54:58 EDT 2020
On 20/07/2020 21:05, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
> On 7/20/20 2:49 PM, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
>> In article <rf4k1c$87c$2 at dont-email.me>, Simon Clubley
>> <clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> writes:
>>
>>> You really don't get it, do you David ?
>>>
>>> If hobbyists cannot be trusted to respect HPE's terms and conditions
>>> when
>>> HPE choose to grant them temporary free access to HPE's products,
>>> then why
>>> should VSI trust anything that those same hobbyists will do when VSI is
>>> considering granting those same hobbyists access to VSI's own products ?
>>>
>>> _NOW_ do you get it David ?
>>
>> I sincerely hope that VSI won't punish all hobbyists due to the
>> misbehaviour of very few.
>>
>
> Mentec!!
>
> bill
>
From what I recall VSI have repeatedly and consistently said they do
not have the rights to issue new VAX/VMS licences. So unlike Mentec I
don't believe they own the rights to VAX/VMS and HPE would have to
pursue any licence violations.
Dave
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list