[Info-vax] [Totally OT] Covid-19 / Politics
John E. Malmberg
wb8tyw at qsl.net_work
Tue Mar 17 09:38:55 EDT 2020
On 3/16/2020 3:00 PM, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
> In article <r4nv0i$h9s$1 at dont-email.me>, Dave Froble
> <davef at tsoft-inc.com> writes:
>
>> my claim about the super delegates stands. Not picked by voters.
>
> If you object to lack of democracy, the Electoral College itself and the
> way the popular vote in a state is converted into delegates is a much
> bigger problem.
With out the Electoral College, for all of its flaws, only a handful of
states (Actually large cities in those states) would effectively decide
most presidential elections.
There are a lot of serious problems that can arise from that that were
seen when the U.S. political system was drawn up.
You can end up with a system where since the votes don't count as much,
the less populous areas end up subsidizing the more populous areas.
An example is the city of Chicago as compared to the rest of Illinois.
The Chicago area and its suburbs are 1/2 the population of Illinois.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/opinion/why-illinois-pols-havent-fixed-our-fiscal-crisis
So if you make promises to Chicago voters that claims to put more money
in their pocket, you will win elections, even if the City of Chicago can
not possibly make enough revenue to pay the bills.
Ideally a city should be more efficient than rural areas and thus should
generate more tax revenue than it needs. In practice we often see the
exact opposite, that heavy subsidies and bailouts are needed.
This pretty much forces most people outside the high population zone to
have to vote for the opposite party of those high population areas just
to try to keep from being snow-balled over, even if they don't fully
agree with that party.
And the U.S. has a lot of population in rural areas. You can see this
political trend in the just about any voting history chart.
Now right though elections all over the world are probably going to be
decided by the people who thought hoarding toilet paper was a good idea
for this Covid-19 crises.
That probably helps to explain our current choices in the U.S.
Be aware that when there is an incumbent president, most states allow
voting in the opposition party primary instead, so those that support
the current president will be casting primary votes for the candidate
that they think is most likely to lose.
And I see a lot of cases where someone outside of this country (Or in
Hollywood) are giving praises to what the current headlines of what one
of the candidates is claiming to represent, with out really knowing the
real history of the candidate.
The reforms that I would like to see are:
1. All voters can vote in every party primary.
2. No political parties listed on a general election ballot.
It is a primary election day for me, the vote is mainly symbolic, going
by past election results. The Chicago area votes alone will pick the
primary winner, unless there is an unusually high turn out in the rest
of the state. The same will be true for the general election.
Regards,
-John
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list