[Info-vax] VMS x86 performance ?

Dave Froble davef at tsoft-inc.com
Fri Oct 30 16:01:36 EDT 2020


On 10/30/2020 2:07 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2020-10-30, Grant Taylor <gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
>> On 10/30/20 8:48 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> absolute performance on VMS x86-64 some VM expected to be typical vs VMS
>>> Alpha some typical 15-20 year old box
>>>
>>> absolute performance on VMS x86-64 some VM expected to be typical vs VMS
>>> Itanium some typical 5-10 year old box
>>
>> These two tests seem to fall back to VUPs to me.
>>
>
> Compute performance is one part of it. I/O performance is another
> thing to consider.
>
> Simon.
>

This concern about performance seems unreasonable to me.

Yes, faster HW will be faster.

But the port to x86 was never about performance.  It was to keep VMS 
usable in the future.  Why?  Because everything on which VMS ran, with 
the exception of emulators, is either dead, or in one case sinking.

People still using VMS are doing so for a reason, and x86 VMS offers 
them a way forward.

-- 
David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA  15486



More information about the Info-vax mailing list