[Info-vax] VSI licencing policy (again), was: Re: VSI has a new CEO

[Phillip Helbig undress to reply]

In article <seekuj$9pd$3 at dont-email.me>, Simon Clubley
<clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> writes: 

> On 2021-08-04, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) <helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de> wrote:
> > In article <imvsv9Ftn6vU1 at mid.individual.net>,
> > calliet_gérard <gerard.calliet at pia-sofer.fr> writes: 
> >
> >> VSI finally informed us that for certain critical market segments
> >> an exception would be possible, with licenses not limited in time.
> >
> > That is good.
> >
> 
> Not good unfortunately. There are only a very few of these segments and
> "critical" is defined by VSI and not the user. Your normal commercial
> business critical system that keeps your company running does not qualify
> based on the last information available.
> 
> Based on the last information available, it's more for some safety
> critical systems (for example) only.

I think that many here are critical of VSI's license policies.  Does 
that count?  :-)