[Info-vax] Licenses on VAX/VMS 4.0/4.1 source code listing scans

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 12/10/2021 4:50 PM, Dave Froble wrote:
> On 12/10/2021 2:23 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
>> On 2021-12-10, Dave Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
>>> Instead, I'll ask these questions.
>>>
>>> What is the problem, if there is nobody to question such usage?
>>>
>>
>> Ownership of assets doesn't cease just because a company fails.
>>
>> You are setting yourself and your customers up for a future owner
>> of the VSI assets to come after you, especially if you reduce the
>> resale value of those assets by coming up with a way to bypass the
>> need for existing VMS customers to purchase more of those assets.
> 
> If there is an entity that allows my customers to continue, then there 
> isn't an issue, is there?
> 
> If there is not an entity, who, other than you and Bill, is going to 
> really give a damn?

There can be cases where there is an entity  willing
to sue copyright violaters without being  willing to
sell a license.

>>> What is your opinion of a vendor potentially destroying a customer's 
>>> business?
>>
>> You know what VSI have done by putting time limits on production
>> licences and you could port away today if the risk is unacceptable
>> to you.
> 
> Porting is not an option.

Porting is per definition an option for all software
at all time.

Everybody makes the decision to port or not port
all the time - some think about it - some make a
decision by not thinking about it.

You can look at expected cost, risk and benefits of not
porting and you look at expected cost, risk and benefits
of porting and you make a decision.

A port may be a rewrite from scratch if the code is
totally non-portable. But there are plenty of
technologies out there to pick and chose from.

Arne