[Info-vax] [OT] Re: Where is EISNER:: and who funds it?

[alanfe...@gmail.com]

On Monday, December 27, 2021 at 3:25:16 PM UTC-5, alanfe... at gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, December 27, 2021 at 10:52:15 AM UTC-5, Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote: 
> > Den 2021-12-27 kl. 14:47, skrev alanfe... at gmail.com: 
> > > On Monday, December 27, 2021 at 5:49:19 AM UTC-5, Johnny Billquist wrote: 
> > >> On 2021-12-26 19:25, alanfe... at gmail.com wrote: 
> > >>> On Saturday, December 25, 2021 at 6:35:26 PM UTC-5, Johnny Billquist wrote: 
> > >>>> On 2021-12-24 04:40, alanfe... at gmail.com wrote: 
> > >>>>> On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 7:55:40 AM UTC-5, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote: 
> > >>>>>> In article <00B6DA8D... at SendSpamHere.ORG>, VAXman- 
> > >>>>>> @SendSpamHere.ORG writes: 
[...]
> 
> Later, to be more precise and more easily reproducible, it was later defined that 0.01 deg. C would be the triple point of water. And you'd have to add some stuff about kelvins in there to get what 0 and 100 deg. are. Not something you're going to do at home, but it doesn't depend on pressure. 

Oops! It does. But there's only temperature and pressure combination that will give you a triple point. 

There is only one triple point. And did you know all that without looking it up? And do you know what the triple point of water even is without looking it up? And do you know the new standard without looking it up (newer than the triple point)? It doesn't really matter for normal everyday use, does it now? And simple? I think not! 
[...]

Alan  (^_^(