[Info-vax] Where is EISNER:: and who funds it?
George Cornelius
cornelius at eisner.decus.org
Tue Dec 28 02:12:21 EST 2021
In article <sqa4av$v1r$1 at news.misty.com>, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
> On 2021-12-26 00:33, Dave Froble wrote:
>> On 12/25/2021 6:05 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>> On 2021-12-24 04:09, alanfe... at gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Anyway, regarding Fahrenheit: Americans aren't switching to the
>>>> "standard,"
>>>> Celsius, for the same reason you're not using a Dvorak keyboard.
>>>> Actually, if
>>>> you want to go all the way you should be using Kelvin, the only "true"
>>>> temperature scale in use.
>>>
>>> Kelvin and Celsius is easy to move between. It's just an offset
>>> difference.
>>>
>>> Â Johnny
>>
>> As far as that goes, so is Fahrenheit with either. It's just a
>> multiplier and an offset.
>
> Of course. But that multiplier is what makes it uglier. Yes, sure,
> anyone can do it. But it's much less straight forward. And you have two
> different offsets for C and K when you come from F.
You forgot Rankine.
But I'll /weigh/ in on the conversion equation.
For mnemonic purposes, this set of equations is a dream (and compilers
are free to optimize away the extra addition or subtraction):
F = ( C + 40 ) * f1 - 40
C = ( F + 40 ) * f2 - 40
where f1 and f2 are the usual conversion factors.
I find it easy to remember the -40 fixed point for these conversions
because my metal shop teacher once talked about molding hammers of
mercury and cooling them, once poured, to -40, Celsius or Fahrenheit.
George
> Everything is just math in the end. Nothing strange to see here. It's
> just a question of how much do you need to remember and compute.
>
>> A couple of lines from a simple VB program I have:
>>
>> Â Â Â C = (F - 32) * 5 / 9
>> Â Â Â F = C * 9 / 5 + 32
>>
>> If I remember correctly (always questionable anymore) for Kelvin the
>> additional constant would be 273. Maybe not.
>
> 273.15 unless I remember wrong. (Checked - I remembered right.)
> So if you have C, add 273.15 and you have K.
> Of course, in most cases, just 273 is good enough.
>
> Johnny
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list