[Info-vax] VSI I64VMS CSWS V2.4-48B subprocesses go bererk?

[Simon Clubley]

On 2021-12-30, Hein RMS van den Heuvel <heinvandenheuvel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 29, 2021 at 10:26:21 PM UTC-5, Steven Schweda wrote:
>> Apparently, the big TCPIP patch (VSI-I64VMS-TCPIP_PAT-V0507-ECO5O-4, 
>> which was supplied on the I640842L3OE DVD) resolves this problem (along 
>> with the exploding BIND server processes), mercifully obviating any 
>> data collection or actual analysis on my part. Thanks again.
>
> Wow, a first pertinent and useful writing in many months! 
>
> A refreshing change from the unfortunately usual back and forth over largely irrelevant subjest.
> The same folks over and over again with their Editor wars, favorite programming languages, how horrible OpenVMS is (Hoff!), how to promote OpenVMS.
> That's all fun over a beer, in person, but I find it excruciatingly painful to skip over here in c.o.v. 
> 178 replies plus offspring on 'where is Eisner' ?!
> Thank you Steven!

What's wrong with coming up with ideas to promote VMS ?

This is exactly the place I would have thought such discussions were
welcome (and needed).

Also, you may not like it, but Stephen is right to say the things he does.
Just because VMS was a leader decades ago, that doesn't mean it doesn't
need changes to stay relevant in today's world. The world is a changing
place and that applies to VMS just as much as it does to everything else.

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.