[Info-vax] Is C++ good in scientific computation? Why did Fortran lose its popularity?
Michael Kraemer @ home
M.Kraemer at gsi.de
Sun Jan 24 13:37:16 EST 2021
Andreas Eder wrote:
> On So 24 Jan 2021 at 18:22, "Michael Kraemer @ home" <M.Kraemer at gsi.de> wrote:
>
>
>>There's more to scientific computing than just vector operation
>>and FORmula TRANslation.
>>Think of increasingly complex large scale experiments at
>>particle accelerators, satellites, telescopes and such.
>>Fortran 77 just isn't appropriate to handle their data definition,
>>reduction, storage and simulation.
>
>
> Modern fortran is no longer like Fortran 77.
Too late.
The transition to C/C++ happened already in the 1990s.
F90 wasn't ready, C/C++ was.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list