[Info-vax] A new suggestion to handle the temporary production licences problem
Andrew Brehm
andrew at netneurotic.net
Fri Jun 4 02:33:39 EDT 2021
On 03/06/2021 15:41, Dave Froble wrote:
> On 6/3/2021 6:23 AM, Andrew Brehm wrote:
>> On 02/06/2021 13:21, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
>>> In article <ihp7m7FjjlnU1 at mid.individual.net>, Andrew Brehm
>>> <andrew at netneurotic.net> writes:
>>>
>>>>> We have 1 core and 4 GB RAM, and the system is quite fast.
>>>>> And I do not consider a system supporting production in the main
>>>>> factory of a leading producer of forrest/garden equipment, as "small".
>>>>>
>>>>> So no, I do not beleive in that solution.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think there will be too many systems like that in the near
>>>> future. As cores and memory become cheaper and cheaper, systems with 1
>>>> core and 4 GB of RAM will become a faint memory.
>>>
>>> Right, so according to your plan no system could run VMS without paying
>>> for support.
>>>
>>
>> Except for very small non-productive systems, yes.
>>
>> And that was the idea.
>
> What about large non-productive systems?
>
Get a hobbyist licence? I'm not sure I understand the question.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list