[Info-vax] Editors, was: Re: VT keyboard replacement

[VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG]

In article <smbq3b$o9$1 at dont-email.me>, Simon Clubley <clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> writes:
>On 2021-11-08, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) <helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de> wrote:
>> In article <b6c4a416-0ccf-4518-b5fa-039d8d23f88cn at googlegroups.com>,
>>=?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_D=E2=80=99Oliveiro?= <lawrencedo99 at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Monday, November 8, 2021 at 6:27:48 PM UTC+13, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
>>> > It is the most efficient, not the most powerful. :-)
>>> 
>>> As in helping you to be the most productive?
>>
>> Exactly.
>>
>
>How exactly ?
>
>By today's standards, EDT's limited functionality makes it the
>assembly language version of editors when compared to other editors
>which are fully featured editors.

Where is the list of *today's standards* for editors?

-- 
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker    VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG

I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.