[Info-vax] VUPs on Pi Zero 2 - was Re: VSI VMS V8.4-2L2 availability?

[Mark Daniel]

On 13/11/21 11:21 am, Dave Froble wrote:
> On 11/12/2021 5:40 PM, Mark Daniel wrote:
>> On 13/11/21 8:44 am, Paul Hardy wrote:
>>> Slo <slovuj at gmail.com> wrote:
8< snip 8<
>> Not challenging the value-for-money of the above unit but recently I was curious
>> how my seven-year-old, dual core, 2.7GHz i5 (macOS 12.0.1) compared to my 20+
>> year workhorse PWS500.
>>
>> Digital Personal WorkStation with 1 CPU and 1536MB running VMS V8.4-2L1
>> Approximate System VUPs Rating : 159.0 ( min: 159.0 max: 159.0 )
>>
>> innotek GmbH VirtualBox with 2 CPU and 3584MB running VMS V9.1-A
>> Approximate System VUPs Rating : 199.1 ( min: 195.8 max: 204.2 )
>>
>> So moving to a (virtual) instance of VMS won't cost me anything performance-wise
>> even if on this humble laptop.  BTW: running two concurrent VUPS.COM produces
>> much the same result.
>>
>> For comparison...
8< snip 8<
> This reliance on a DCL procedure to calculate VUPS isn't very reliable, 
> other than comparing the same command procedure on different systems to 
> see the difference.8< snip 8<

...ba-boom.

-- 
Anyone, who using social-media, forms an opinion regarding anything 
other than the relative cuteness of this or that puppy-dog, needs 
seriously to examine their critical thinking.