[Info-vax] CRTL and RMS vs SSIO

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 10/7/2021 8:50 AM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> On 10/6/21 11:10 PM, Dave Froble wrote:
>> the real issue is that SSIO was aimed (it seems) at PostgreSQL.
> 
> And Apache, and Samba, and other things that have been explicitly
> mentioned as having needed app-specific workarounds due to the absence
> of shared stream I/O support. SSIO *is* the general-purpose solution
> that you seem to be lamenting the lack of.

Samba I totally get.

Multiple PC's writing to a file on a Samba share would create
some interesting scenarios.

But why does Apache need it?

It should read files to serve - and since it is serving VMS files
then I think it be as VMSish as possible so totally standard RMS.
And it should write sequential text files like access.log.

What am I missing?

Arne