[Info-vax] CRTL and RMS vs SSIO
Lawrence D’Oliveiro
lawrencedo99 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 21:19:33 EDT 2021
On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 7:28:07 AM UTC+13, Simon Clubley wrote:
> The same is true for VMS CLIs BTW. DCL is tightly bound into VMS
> in a horrible way it should not be. On Linux, both the command
> shell and filesystem architectures are vastly cleaner and more
> modular than they are on VMS.
Fundamental difference in mindset: process creation in VMS is expensive and to be avoided if possible, while on *nix systems it’s something you do as naturally as breathing.
And of course the VMS mindset continued over into Windows NT...
> However, if VMS had been designed in a later era ...
Note that Unix predates VMS. Folks at DEC would have been aware of it right from the early days, since it was born on DEC hardware.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list