[Info-vax] CRTL and RMS vs SSIO
Lawrence D’Oliveiro
lawrencedo99 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 17 18:45:55 EDT 2021
On Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:38:42 AM UTC+13, Simon Clubley wrote:
>
> Some reading for you Lawrence:
>
> https://sector7.com/
Are you trying to prove it can’t be done, or that it can?
Hmm, I can’t seem to find any mention of VMS terminal driver emulation. Even I can figure out how to do that...
Or subprocess semantics, for that matter.
Or DECnet. Or PPFs.
> Yet, even though these alternatives existed at the start of the port
> of VMS to x86-64, there was still sufficient customer demand for a
> "real" VMS on x86-64.
Maybe the technical quality of their solution is not up to scratch (as per the issues above). Or maybe the issues are not technical, but marketing.
> The above should also give you a feeling for the scale of the issues
> involved. And unlike your hand waving dismissal of the difficult issues ...
I haven’t handwaved anything. I’ve been quite prepared to give detailed, considered answers to detailed, considered questions.
> these people have actually thought about the difficult issues and
> provided answers for some of them.
And maybe they missed some ...
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list