[Info-vax] CRTL and RMS vs SSIO
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Mon Oct 18 19:07:03 EDT 2021
On 2021-10-18 00:18:05 +0000, Simon Clubley said:
> And Sector 7 (and others IIRC) have done various pieces of this, yet
> there's still a market for real VMS systems.
FreeVMS, as well.
By the time VSI could get all the APIs across to Linux, it's a ~decade
added to the VSI schedule, and with ~little forward progress elsewhere
within OpenVMS.
The existing (and mostly-working) x86-64 port will already be a ~decade
arriving with the V9.2-1 schedule, starting from when VSI decloaked.
Porting specific apps to Linux with or without wrappers can be and
usually an incremental process.
A vendor kernel swap—or more likely a wholesale kernel fork—doesn't
have the luxury of supporting a subset of the APIs.
And who knows where Linux and server platforms will be in a decade,
given the increasingly integrated and increasingly heterogeneous system
designs already available.
Trade-offs here shift, too.
Current-generation vendor-integrated SSD storage is now running ~at
DDR3-1066 / PC3-8500 RAM (unregistered) speeds.
That's approximately the speed of main memory on Integrity rx2800,
which runs DDR3-1066R registered...
Swapping for L4 / OKL4 / newer / around the time of the OpenVMS Arm
port is another discussion.
But now? Kernel swaps? With V9.1-A available? Nope.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list