[Info-vax] [OT?] Should compiler warnings be treated as errors ?
John Reagan
xyzzy1959 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 13 16:45:59 EDT 2021
On Monday, September 13, 2021 at 2:24:03 PM UTC-4, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2021-09-13, Robert A. Brooks <FIRST... at vmssoftware.com> wrote:
> > On 9/13/2021 2:00 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, it looks like you will be bringing the first ever COBOL compiler
> >> to LLVM although I suspect VSI will not be able to release the COBOL
> >> frontend source code.
> > The front ends are all mostly common code (they may be 100% common code, but
> > I'll hedge my bets).
> >
> > Even if we released the front ends, without Gem itself and the Gem-to-LLVM shim,
> > it's be of little use.
> >
> > We are not releasing the front ends.
> >
> Somehow, I thought that would be the answer... :-)
> Simon.
>
> --
> Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
> Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.
They aren't ours to release. Again, VSI *LICENSES* the code from HPE. While I'm not
a lawyer, the copyright statement in the code we got from HPE is pretty clear (I've posted
that before). While I don't have a problem with open-sourcing the code, we need HPE's
permission.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list