[Info-vax] VSI strategy for OpenVMS
Jan-Erik Söderholm
jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com
Tue Sep 14 02:34:03 EDT 2021
Den 2021-09-14 kl. 02:14, skrev Arne Vajhøj:
> On 9/13/2021 8:01 PM, chris wrote:
>> On 09/13/21 18:24, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>> Bill Gunshannon<bill.gunshannon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Any browser requires a desktop. I thought that idea had been abandoned?
>>>
>>> No it doesn't, that is the beauty of DECWindows. Mind you, there's really
>>> no reason to have a browser on a machine without a desktop, other than
>>> for diagnostic purposes and downloads. But it's not required, and it is
>>> occasionally handy.
>>>
>>> Does "occasionally handy" warrant an enormous effort to port a modern
>>> browser
>>> to VMS? I don't think so. But if someone here wants to give it a try,
>>> have
>>> at it. That's the beauty of open source.
>>
>> A lot of system management is done via browsers, for years now. Also, for
>> software dev, nothing beats a windowing system with multiple
>> terminal windows and tabbed full screen editors. I used to be pretty
>> deft with edt on a vt terminal but those days are gone forever. All the
>> ilom i've worked with works far better using a browser for access. A sort
>> of universal access method for systems. So yes, lack of a browser might
>> be seen as a serious disadvantage.
>
> Web interfaces are very common for admin stuff today.
>
> But usually running the browser on a PC will work fine.
>
> Arne
>
I'd say that the browser is *never* run on the system that is managed.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list