[Info-vax] Rust as a HS language, was: Re: Quiet?

[Dan Cross]

In article <jb8cf5F6634U1 at mid.individual.net>,
Bill Gunshannon  <bill.gunshannon at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 4/7/22 10:45, Dan Cross wrote:
>> In article <t2l82r$1s8o$1 at gioia.aioe.org>,
>> chris  <chris-nospam at tridac.net> wrote:
>>> I don't like anything that claims or predisposes to protect me from
>>> my own stupidity.  Prefer the freedom to make my own mistakes and
>>> learn from them. Not more nanny state, however fashionable it
>>> may be...
>> 
>> Seatbelts are for wimps, I guess.  There's lots to be learned
>> being thrown through the windshield of a moving car.
>> 
>
>Another problem, really but seatbelts are more of a matter of
>political control than safety.  Other wise most states would
>not prohibit the use of 4 and 6 point belts in favor of 3 point
>belts with high failure rates that are also harder to get the
>occupant out of the car when overturned than the standard 4 or
>6 point belt.

But we generally agree that restraints help prevent injuries
versus no restraints, right?

	- Dan C.